Examination result oriented teaching is in essence a notion whereby the instructor understands the examination contents quite well and takes the class with the coursework, all the whilst maintaining his/her attention to the idea the only purpose is always to allow the individual to acquire high grades at the examination itself , irregardless of the curriculum contents.
Whilst there exists no disagreeing that this educating strategy achieves the goal of making sure the great bulk of students will score very well at the examinations, one have to question again - is this the right technique to teach our small children?
In most cases, the system that incorporates an exam outcome oriented strategy of teaching is developing a fictitious condition of "easy testing." This might cause a pupil who transfers out of this school and into one where by a far more traditional philosophy is taught and practiced to flunk terribly since there's no longer a very concise and clear knowing of precisely what to be expecting when it comes time for exams.
Similarly, when a pupil graduates right from high school and makes its way into university, should they happen to attend a college, or maybe a course, where examination result oriented teaching just isn't the common approach, they're going to find it inevitably far more tough to show good results in that testing environment. Nonetheless, in addition to immersing in an exams-oriented teaching environment, learners can implement ways to perform well in exams.
Examination result oriented teaching causes a unrealistic perception of safety as well as confidence in life itself. A student who has been through an examination outcome oriented education isn't going to see how to recover after they have a misstep on an exam; neither do they understand how to study vigorously for any "unknown" of not being able to assert with guarantee that they without a doubt know every one of the solutions to all of the issues in life - er - to each of the questions that could be on the examination.
When the pros are heavily weighted in the benefits for the school; for retention of essential funding and to the all round ease of the cookie-cutter curriculum that gets stale and repeatable, the cons are significantly far more ominous for our little ones who are not learning the invaluable ability of the way to find out on their own, or how to study intensely for anything they want or ought to attain.
When these young ones enter the labor force and the real world they may learn that the utopia they're used to, this total perception of entitlement, carries with it a harsh epiphany that world isn't fair. That life is just not simple. And regrettably, they are ill-prepared.
This could induce depressive symptoms, confusion, in addition to hopelessness. This could possibly bring about an otherwise ordinary person to really perform sub-par in their careers, and thus make a lifelong path of underachieving; merely because they were never made clear to all through their formative time how to work hard to acquire what they want, instead of needing all the things essentially given to them.
Nonetheless, it is also likely that the confidence that was developed by a somewhat "easy" education approach functions to offer a young adult the self-confidence to do well in more demanding scenarios. When presented with an unknown variable, they're going to come to feel assured that they can take on it with finesse and comfort, because - after all - they've generally been able to perform so.
Therefore, when they enter into the workforce and society as an adult, may possibly a go-getter, since they recognize they are able to do well. It's been a established reality of their whole life till adulthood that they carry with them throughout each obstacle they encounter in life.
The jury may very well be out to the actual impact to society of examination result oriented teaching, nonetheless it is clear that we are teaching our youngsters a lesson - regardless of whether it's a positive lesson or perhaps a damaging lesson might not yet still be crystal clear.
Whilst there exists no disagreeing that this educating strategy achieves the goal of making sure the great bulk of students will score very well at the examinations, one have to question again - is this the right technique to teach our small children?
In most cases, the system that incorporates an exam outcome oriented strategy of teaching is developing a fictitious condition of "easy testing." This might cause a pupil who transfers out of this school and into one where by a far more traditional philosophy is taught and practiced to flunk terribly since there's no longer a very concise and clear knowing of precisely what to be expecting when it comes time for exams.
Similarly, when a pupil graduates right from high school and makes its way into university, should they happen to attend a college, or maybe a course, where examination result oriented teaching just isn't the common approach, they're going to find it inevitably far more tough to show good results in that testing environment. Nonetheless, in addition to immersing in an exams-oriented teaching environment, learners can implement ways to perform well in exams.
Examination result oriented teaching causes a unrealistic perception of safety as well as confidence in life itself. A student who has been through an examination outcome oriented education isn't going to see how to recover after they have a misstep on an exam; neither do they understand how to study vigorously for any "unknown" of not being able to assert with guarantee that they without a doubt know every one of the solutions to all of the issues in life - er - to each of the questions that could be on the examination.
When the pros are heavily weighted in the benefits for the school; for retention of essential funding and to the all round ease of the cookie-cutter curriculum that gets stale and repeatable, the cons are significantly far more ominous for our little ones who are not learning the invaluable ability of the way to find out on their own, or how to study intensely for anything they want or ought to attain.
When these young ones enter the labor force and the real world they may learn that the utopia they're used to, this total perception of entitlement, carries with it a harsh epiphany that world isn't fair. That life is just not simple. And regrettably, they are ill-prepared.
This could induce depressive symptoms, confusion, in addition to hopelessness. This could possibly bring about an otherwise ordinary person to really perform sub-par in their careers, and thus make a lifelong path of underachieving; merely because they were never made clear to all through their formative time how to work hard to acquire what they want, instead of needing all the things essentially given to them.
Nonetheless, it is also likely that the confidence that was developed by a somewhat "easy" education approach functions to offer a young adult the self-confidence to do well in more demanding scenarios. When presented with an unknown variable, they're going to come to feel assured that they can take on it with finesse and comfort, because - after all - they've generally been able to perform so.
Therefore, when they enter into the workforce and society as an adult, may possibly a go-getter, since they recognize they are able to do well. It's been a established reality of their whole life till adulthood that they carry with them throughout each obstacle they encounter in life.
The jury may very well be out to the actual impact to society of examination result oriented teaching, nonetheless it is clear that we are teaching our youngsters a lesson - regardless of whether it's a positive lesson or perhaps a damaging lesson might not yet still be crystal clear.
About the Author:
The author has been a tutor for the last 5 years in Singapore, an exams result oriented country. she writes often in her blog on taking exams such as O levels and PSLE in Singapore.
No comments:
Post a Comment