Teacher evaluation is an important factor that helps a learning institution develop their mode of teaching. Through the process they are able to gauge the performance of their students, relevant to how lessons are taught. Department heads schedules this activity from time to time without informing the teachers to get an idea on how they conduct their classes.
During this visit, they are to observe certain factors in the delivery of the lesson. They may or may not take down important points to remember. Classroom walkthroughs are done from time to time but institutions are not required to do it. It is never considered as a concrete way of evaluating teacher and student performance. When this procedure is done, here are the common things that are taken into account.
Behavior of the class. The way on how the class behaves reflects how well the teacher is handling them. This also includes the level of their participation. The more pumped up they are to participate the better.
Lesson plans prepared by teachers. The observers need not to take a peek at an actual written lesson plan. Judging from the delivery of the lesson, he can see the contents of the discussion and its arrangement. It will also give him an idea of the speed by which students are taught and whether or not it is effective.
Methods of motivation. To start the class right, one needs to set the mood. The method employed by the teacher in starting the session and firing up the students interest on the lesson matters here. Observers are always on the lookout for a unique way in handling classes and those techniques that generate response from the participants.
Level of comprehension. It is also a vital thing to see how well the students understand the lesson. No matter how an expert a mentor is, if he does not know how to convey them to the rest, it will still not work. Those who are doing the walkthroughs are careful in noting down how well the information is conveyed to the participants.
Feedback. Questions asked to the teachers are not bad things. In fact, it is a good sign that the student is listening and is willing to learn more about the topic. The way on how the teacher addresses the person and how he complements them is a good practice in interaction.
Professionalism. Of course, the overall bearing of the mentor matters. From his punctuality to his ability to handle the behavior of the class, his level of professionalism will be measured. This factor is important since participants are most likely to respect those mentors who show them a good example.
Private or not, more and more institutions are seeing the importance of this mechanism. While not mandated by law, this method has proven to be effective in fostering dialogue with the faculty and the administration. This is one method employed to make some changes as needed in the delivery of lessons to the whole gathering.
During this visit, they are to observe certain factors in the delivery of the lesson. They may or may not take down important points to remember. Classroom walkthroughs are done from time to time but institutions are not required to do it. It is never considered as a concrete way of evaluating teacher and student performance. When this procedure is done, here are the common things that are taken into account.
Behavior of the class. The way on how the class behaves reflects how well the teacher is handling them. This also includes the level of their participation. The more pumped up they are to participate the better.
Lesson plans prepared by teachers. The observers need not to take a peek at an actual written lesson plan. Judging from the delivery of the lesson, he can see the contents of the discussion and its arrangement. It will also give him an idea of the speed by which students are taught and whether or not it is effective.
Methods of motivation. To start the class right, one needs to set the mood. The method employed by the teacher in starting the session and firing up the students interest on the lesson matters here. Observers are always on the lookout for a unique way in handling classes and those techniques that generate response from the participants.
Level of comprehension. It is also a vital thing to see how well the students understand the lesson. No matter how an expert a mentor is, if he does not know how to convey them to the rest, it will still not work. Those who are doing the walkthroughs are careful in noting down how well the information is conveyed to the participants.
Feedback. Questions asked to the teachers are not bad things. In fact, it is a good sign that the student is listening and is willing to learn more about the topic. The way on how the teacher addresses the person and how he complements them is a good practice in interaction.
Professionalism. Of course, the overall bearing of the mentor matters. From his punctuality to his ability to handle the behavior of the class, his level of professionalism will be measured. This factor is important since participants are most likely to respect those mentors who show them a good example.
Private or not, more and more institutions are seeing the importance of this mechanism. While not mandated by law, this method has proven to be effective in fostering dialogue with the faculty and the administration. This is one method employed to make some changes as needed in the delivery of lessons to the whole gathering.
About the Author:
When you are looking for information about classroom walkthroughs, you can pay a visit to the web pages online here today. Details are available at http://www.instructionalrounds.com now.
No comments:
Post a Comment